About this blog

The authors of this blog are lawyers or consultants employed by the RCT Group of companies, which includes staff who work mainly within our Stringer Clark offices.

From time to time, we may also invite guest bloggers to contribute, in which case this will be made clear. Authors who are part of the RCT Group are qualified to practice law in Victoria, Australia. Any advice applies to Victorian State law as at the date of first publication. The information is a general guide only and is not a substitute for legal advice applicable to a user's own circumstances.

Residents of other Australian States or Territories or countries are advised to seek legal advice from a lawyer practising in their own area, as laws may vary from region to region.

Recent Authors

Angela Sdrinis

Angela Sdrinis is a senior partner with Ryan Carlisle Thomas. She is an LIV Accredited Specialist in Personal Injuries with extensive experience in Comcare matters.

Richard Derks

Richard Derks is a Partner of the firm and practices in the area of personal injury including WorkSafe and transport accidents. He is an advocate in a variety of forums for the rights of the victims of accidents at work and on the roads.

Shaun Marcus

Shaun Marcus is a Partner of the firm. He is an LIV Accredited Specialist in Personal Injuries, practising in this area with a particular focus on workers compensation and asbestos claims.

Peter Claven

Peter Claven practices in personal injury at our Warrnambool office. He joined Stringer Clark in 2007 and is a member of the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

Michael Burdess

Michael Burdess joined Stringer Clark in early 2006 and practices in the area of personal injury including WorkSafe and TAC.

Penny Savidis

Penny Savidis is a Partner of the firm and practices predominantly in the area of employment law.

Published: 10 February 2012

The Labour Lawyer returns to his correspondence.

Dear Minister for All Things

President: Fair Work Australia

Now that the holiday season has concluded and Parliament has resumed I thought it fair to trouble you again.

As you know the Honourable Geoffrey Giudice AM President of Fair Work Australia is to soon retire after 15 years in the job. No replacement has yet been announced.

Senator Abetz has spoken of the President’s capacity as a “Judicial Officer with the demeanor to match”. Regrettably Abetz has also spoken of recent appointees to Fair Work Australia as “an endless tribe of Trade Union Officials”.

My purpose in writing is to express the hope that the President’s replacement will display the same degree of courtesy and consideration as that shown by the outgoing President. Justice Giudice has earned the respect of all concerned with the AIRC and FWA, not least because of his courtesy (and good humour).

Whether a party is self represented or appears by Senior Counsel, Labour Lawyer or Union Official, there can be little doubt that the confidence and esteem with which an institution such as Fair Work Australia is regarded, is profoundly influenced by the manner in which its members conduct themselves.

Such simple attributes as courtesy and good manners from those holding judicial or quasijudicial appointment should not be overlooked. Regrettably, as experience in Canberra and elsewhere shows, sometimes such qualities are ignored.

Yours respectfully,

The Labour Lawyer

 

From the Office of the Minister for All Things

Dear Labour Lawyer

President: Fair Work Australia

Thank you for your letter after the holiday break. In referring to the FWA President’s unfailing courtesy and consideration you have identified one of the few things on which I agree with Senator Abetz.

I am confident that the Government’s appointee to the post of FWA President will have the qualities to which you refer.

I note that the Modern Award exercise undertaken by the Tribunal and overseen by the President required extraordinary efforts on his part and was carried out in accordance with the legislation with great care.

I also note that Senator Abetz is critical of the minimum terms and conditions in Modern Awards describing them as a “perspective throwback with a rigid ‘one size fits all’ approach”. It is not clear to what instrument they are said to be a throwback. Nonetheless it is clear enough that the maintenance of even the bare minimum terms and conditions to be found in Modern Awards are not part of his or the Liberal agenda.

Yours sincerely,

The Minister For All Things

Share this article:

Background
Background

Please enter a search term to begin your search.