About this blog

The authors of this blog are lawyers or consultants employed by the RCT Group of companies, which includes staff who work mainly within our Stringer Clark offices.

From time to time, we may also invite guest bloggers to contribute, in which case this will be made clear. Authors who are part of the RCT Group are qualified to practice law in Victoria, Australia. Any advice applies to Victorian State law as at the date of first publication. The information is a general guide only and is not a substitute for legal advice applicable to a user's own circumstances.

Residents of other Australian States or Territories or countries are advised to seek legal advice from a lawyer practising in their own area, as laws may vary from region to region.

Recent Authors

Christian Farrelly

Christian Farrelly is a solicitor whose professional focus is superannuation. He also has an interest in commercial and criminal law and wills and probate.

Michael Burdess

Michael Burdess joined Stringer Clark in early 2006 and practices in the area of personal injury including WorkSafe and TAC.

Creon Coolahan

Creon Coolahan is a solicitor in our Warrnambool office and has extensive experience in a range of practice areas with a focus on injury law and employment issues.

Penny Savidis

Penny Savidis is an Partner of the firm and practices predominantly in the area of employment law.

Angela Sdrinis

Angela Sdrinis is a senior partner with Ryan Carlisle Thomas. She is an LIV Accredited Specialist in Personal Injuries with extensive experience in Comcare matters.

Published: 24 June 2011
Author: Xavier Farrelly

Drivers holding their breath over drink driving charges

It is not unusual for drivers to try to wriggle out of a drink driving charge, usually with little success. But a recent case has hundreds of lawyers and their clients, well, holding their collective legal breath.

In the matter of the Director of Public Prosecutions v Piscopo, which has now run through several courts, Mr. Piscopo has contested the legality of a drink driving charge of failing to accompany police back to the station for a second breath test. He first failed a roadside breathalyser test.

A second breath test is required as evidence in proving any drink driving charge. Complying with a police request is not mandatory but if you don't you will be charged with failing to accompany which carries a minimum 24 month suspension of license.

Mr Piscopo initially won his case at the Magistrates' Court and has since won his case in the Supreme Court on 12 November 2010. The result has been appealed by the DPP to the Court of Appeal.

The Supreme Court said the police had failed to make a valid request for Mr Piscopo to accompany them to the station because they had not explained to him that he was only required to remain at the police station for a maximum of three hours, or until a sample of breath was furnished. As a valid request had not been made the Court held that Mr Piscopo had not failed to accompany the police.

This case also only applies to instances where police gave the old warning. The police have since amended the warning they issue to drink drivers so that the defence is not usually available to those charged in the last few months.

However anyone facing charges prior to that time could well have their case dismissed should the Court of Appeal rule in favour of Piscopo.

Xavier Farrelly works at Stringer Clark in Warrnambool and Portland. While his primary area of practice is injury law, Xavier also handles criminal proceedings for clients in South West Victoria.

Share this article:

Background
Background

Please enter a search term to begin your search.